Compare and Contrast Ethics and Virtue Theory - 802 Words

Ethics and virtue have been a very contentious issue facing society for centuries. Many argue over the merits of various theories, each with its own philosophies and assumptions. It is this argument that has given rise to many popular and followed theories of ethics and virtues. The theories discussed primarily in this document include the virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological theory. Each is very distinct to the others in regards to its principles and assumptions regarding human behavior. Each however, has merit in regards to question of ethics and virtue, and how it should subsequently be valued. Virtue Theory relies heavily on the character of the person rather than the circumstances in which the individual acts. The virtue theory deemphasizes rules and regulations and instead focuses on the internal character of the act in question. The virtue theory is not concerned with the intentions of the act. Nor is it concerned primarily with the consequences of the act. Instead the virtue theory relies on moral virtues. If the individual is of good character or not is the primary concern with virtue theory. What is difficult to ascertain however, is the question of what constitutes character? How can one appropriate establish the contents of ones character? A persons character traits are the compesition of his character traits. These traits can either be good (virtuous) or bad (vices). In both instances, the virtue theory establishes and emphasized these twoShow MoreRelatedThe Ethics Of Virtue Ethics925 Words   |  4 PagesVirtue ethics is a normative theory whose foundations were laid by Aristotle. This theory approaches normative ethics in substantially different ways than consequentialist and deontological theories. In this essay, I will contrast and compare virtue ethics to utilitarianism, ethical egoism, and Kantianism to demonstrate these differences. There is one fundamental aspect of virtue ethics that sets it apart from the other theories I will discuss. For the sake of brevity and to avoid redundancy, I willRead MoreEthics : Virtue Ethics And Ethics1351 Words   |  6 Pages 1. what is virtue ethics and what does it do that the two major ethical approaches do not? Virtue ethics is one of the three major approaches in ethics. This approach of ethics emphasizes the virtues, or moral character, in contrast to other approaches which emphasizes duties or rules. Virtue ethics has three central concepts; virtue, practical wisdom, and eudemonia, however, these are often misunderstood. The three approaches of ethics are virtue ethics, consequentialist ethics, and deontologyRead More7 Philosophies Essay1449 Words   |  6 Pages| The Seven Moral Philosophies | Compare and Contrast Research Paper | | Terence A. Betts | 3/27/2011 | Instructor: Kimber Cramer Davenport University | The textbook breaks down seven philosophies used in business decisions; they are Teleology, Egoism, Utilitarianism, Deontology, Relativist, Virtue ethics, and Justice. In this paper I will define each of the seven listed and compare and contrast so that it is clear to decipher each one from the other. Also I will provide anRead MoreAldo Leopold’S Essay â€Å"The Land Ethic† Was Published In1122 Words   |  5 PagesAldo Leopold’s essay â€Å"The Land Ethic† was published in A Sand County Almanac. The short paper confronts the imperfections in the most common approaches in preserving the environment. Leopold’s answer is to develop a new branch of environmental ethics to model humanity’s ever-changing relationship with the environment. Leopold observantly describes the history of ethics, the meaning of community with the land and why it’s appropriate to do so. Toward the end of the essay – as the reader is ready forRead MorePsyc hological and Ethical Egoism, Mill vs Kant, and Ethical Relativism904 Words   |  4 PagesTopic 1 Distinguish between psychological and ethical egoism and subject each to critical scrutiny in detail. Compare and contrast ethical egoism with virtue theory. Egoism is a view that states that what a person wants is somewhat relevant to what humans actually do. There is two main types of egoism: psychological and ethical. These two views are very similar; because of this they can easily be interchanged. It is important to be able to recognize the dissimilarity of these two views. PsychologicalRead MoreWhat Makes A Good Person?933 Words   |  4 Pagesperson you think you are and the person you’re aspired to be. This is the main element of virtue ethics. Virtue ethics focuses on specific qualities that make a good person. Also, what thrives and contributed to lead a successful life. Compared to utilitarian, virtue ethics doesn’t need any type of rules or formulas to deciding what qualities are virtues and vices. It states in Ethical Argument, â€Å"†¦virtue ethics tend to play down the importance of principles and stress the nature of the person whoRead MoreMy Personal And Professional Ethics Essay1087 Words   |  5 Pageson biomedical ethics. There are morals that have been engrained into my character. These include what is right or wrong and how I will behave in certain situations. I will compare my personal and professional ethics in order to be ready for my healthcare career. My personal ethics are deeply implemented into my professional ethics. This could make conflicts arise between my professional workplace and personal ethical view because of differing perspectives on issues. My personal ethics govern how IRea d MorePositve Psychology and Aristotles Virtue Ethics Converge Essay1569 Words   |  7 Pageswell as, eudemonic happiness, as key components to optimal mental health. Like many other contemporary theories, positive psychology borrows principles and tenets of philosophies, which preceded its formal conception. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast virtue, character strengths, relationships, and happiness as presented by positive psychology with Aristotle’s virtue ethics theory. Positive psychology utilizes five pillars in order to flourish, achieve fulfillment, and satisfactionRead MoreConsequentialism And Consequentialism : Virtue Ethics, Consequentialism, And Deontology1200 Words   |  5 PagesEthics is a study dealing with standards that prescribe rules on what people ought to do based on various criteria such as obligation, human rights, and virtue. More precisely, it is a development and establishment of one’s moral principle. And under the normative ethics, there are three categories of ethical frameworks: virtue ethics, consequentialism, and deontology. In this essay, I will more concentrate on consequentialism, especially utilitarianism, and deontology to make compare and contrastRead MoreParameters of Ethical Decision Making1342 Words   |  6 Pagesdecision making, we are better equipped to make the right choices when the need arises. Joseph Weiss (2009) identifies fundamental ethical principles that guide decision making: utilitarianis m, universalism, rights, justice, and ethical virtue. John Rawls contributes his Theory of Justice as Fairness as another approach for consideration in resolving ethical dilemmas. Utilitarianism The utilitarian view states that an action is considered right or good based on its consequences (2009). The utilitarian

The Prodigal God Younger Brother vs. Older Brother Free Essays

Writing II-1st Younger Brother Sin vs. Older Brother Sin Luke 15:11-32 is one of the most famous parables in the Bible. It is the parable of the prodigal son. We will write a custom essay sample on The Prodigal God: Younger Brother vs. Older Brother or any similar topic only for you Order Now This parable is about a son who runs away with his inheritance, wastes all of it, and then comes back home to his father’s open arms. Tim Keller goes more in depth into this parable with his book The Prodigal God. In this book, Keller compares the two sons’ sins, â€Å"two brothers, each of whom represents a different way to be alienated from God, and a different way to seek acceptance into the Kingdom of heaven† (9). Throughout the book, comparisons can be made between the younger brother’s sin and the older brother’s sin. The younger brother was selfish and wanted his inheritance immediately so that he can go party. The older brother follows all of the rules to get things and doesn’t want his brother to come back. Throughout The Prodigal God, comparison can made between the two brothers’ sin in that both of their intentions are selfish and they both want control. Tim Keller’s book is more than just discussing the parable of the prodigal son. While the tradition seems to focus more on the younger brother and his sins, Keller goes more depth with the older brother and his faults, â€Å"Most readings of this parable have concentrated on the flight and return of the younger brother-the ‘Prodigal Son. ’ That misses the real message of the story, however, because there are two brothers, each of whom represents a different way to be alienated from God, and a different way to seek acceptance into the Kingdom of heaven† (9). The first way that the older brother and the younger brother’s sins are similar is that both of their intentions are selfish. With the younger brother, he wanted his inheritance early so he could go and party. â€Å"The young man humiliates his family and lives a self-indulgent, dissolute life. He is totally out of control. He is alienated from his father. † (39) This behavior showed he wanted freedom for himself and that he was impatient. Keller goes on to say that the younger brother thought of his relationship with his father as unimportant and he only wanted him for his possessions. He says that once he got tired of the relationship, he basically said that he was tired of it and he wanted out. Even though the older brother is different, his sins are still of the same context. He obeys all of his father’s rules so that he appears to be a good son, yet he is only doing these things to take advantage of his father so that he can get what he wants. â€Å"Elder brothers obey God to get things. They don’t obey God to get God himself- in order to resemble him, love him, know him, and delight in him. So religious and moral people can be avoiding Jesus as Savior and Lord as much as younger brothers say they don’t believe in God and define right and wrong for themselves† (49). The second way in which the younger brothers and the older brother’s sins are similar is that they both want control. â€Å"There are two ways to be your own Savior and Lord. One is by breaking all the moral laws and setting your own course, and one is by keeping all the moral laws and being very, very good. † (50) Both brothers sought to control the father. The younger brother wants the inheritance to have control over his own life. â€Å"He wanted to make his own decisions and have unfettered control of his portion of wealth. (41) The younger brother felt he could handle is life without any help, but he needed earthly treasures so that he could feel powerful. The older brother is keeping all of the rules so that he can get his way with his father. â€Å"Elder brothers do good to others, but not out of delight in deeds themselves, or for the love of the people or the pleasure of God† (70). The older brother feels his obedience should keep his father obligated t o him. When his father offers the younger brother forgiveness and a feast, the older brother is angry because he has lost control over his father. The obedience the older brother kept for so many years seems to be futile. â€Å"It is impossible to forgive someone if you feel superior to him or her. †(63) When looked at more closely, the younger brother and older brother show an unexpected similarity in their sins throughout the parable of the prodigal son. Keller states in his book The Prodigal God that the goal of this book is to lay the essentials of the gospel, and to either introduce or reassure the message of both this story and the gospel. This parable is thought of as one of the best readings in the Bible to help someone grasp the understanding of God’s love. How to cite The Prodigal God: Younger Brother vs. Older Brother, Papers

Law and Leadership in Nursing Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Law and Leadership in Nursing. Answer: Introduction In the field ofnursing and care to a patient, several factors affect the decision and judgement of various clinical cases. Such decisions and judgements are very important as they determine the next course of action. The fact that a human life depends on the very decision, calls for great precision and most sound judgement to make the right moves. Professional nurses are trained on how to go about this including various leadership theories that have been established. Even with this, however, nurses are sometimes faced with cases that are new in both magnitude and direction, and their decision needed. In such cases, nurses must be careful and sometimes fast. The factors affecting decision made by Kevin and Daisy, advise to their case and justification for the advice in accordance with the leadership theories are discussed next. Factors Affecting The Decision Made By Kevin And Daisy There are several factors that affect the decision made by Kevin and Daisy. These include: Familiarity This implies how conversant the two are with the work environment. The duo are students and have not been in this environment before and as such its overwhelming for them. They have only learnt in class but have not had an opportunity to practise what theyve learnt. Familiarity may also to imply the case in question. Its true to say that they have not dealt with such a case as Mr. Smiths. this affects their decision making. Uniqueness The uniqueness of the case also affects the decision made by Kevin and Daisy. Every patient presents with their own unique set of signs and symptoms. No two patients are likely to present with exactly similar signs and symptoms. This ultimately influences their decision as they must judge each clinical case as presented. This seems a hard task especially to these novice nurses. It can be concluded that since each case is unique, the decisions made will vary depending on the different situations and cases. Certainty This implies to the extent of the knowledge that Daisy and Kevin have in relation to various clinical cases. Presence of guidelines may influence the amount of information that these two have. If they are well certain about the diagnosis that can be arrived at using such a set of symptoms, then their decision-making process easier and simplified. On the other hand, if they are not certain about such signs and symptoms, then they are likely to have a hard time arriving at the decision. Either way, the information owned by the duo and their certainty influences the decision that they make. Urgency The urgency with which diagnosis and management of the patient is needed also influences the decision made by the nurse. In this case, Kevin and Daisy are the nurses and Mr Smith is the patient. The patient is sitting, and despite saying that he is feeling unwell, the two students, it seems, judges the case as not urgent. The time available may be limited and in such cases, quick decision making and interventions are necessary and vital. In other cases, investigation requires more time and the decision is consequently delayed. The duo, Kevin and Daisy, have also in mind the advice of Mr. Henry that its good to take their tea on time. This inevitably affects the decision they make since they tell the patient that they will take a tea break and be back after 20 minutes. Advise To Kevin And Daisy First, they need to understand that they will meet different cases and that each decision thy make will depend on several factors as discussed above. They will require to have a great wealth of information as pertains to clinical cases. This will assist them exude the necessary confidence during their work. This is important also in reassuring the patient of their wellbeing. Kevin and Daisy also need to understand that their own initiative will be needed in several cases. For instance, though their head would prefer them to have their tea on time, they should be able to judge the best time to do that sometimes depending on the situation and the working environment. Kevin and Daisy should also maintain high professional standards and show understanding of emotional intelligence, moral courage and professional indemnity. These are the guiding blocks that teach them to do what is in their hands and to ask for help in cases where they have challenges. Upholding high levels of honesty and hard work in their practice is also necessary in ensuring that they can effectively perform their obligation. Justification For The Advice About Various Leadership Theories Giltinane, (2013) leadership theories form a framework of decision making. The theories give informed choices about the various ways people should respond to critical and complex situations. Different theories give different perspectives of what people should do when making complex decisions or assuming leadership roles. The great man theory emphasizes the statement that the history of the world is made by the biography of great men. This emphasizes that, people who make good choices in life always form the pattern of how things ought to be carried out. In relation to the case of Daisy and Kevin, they should seek advice from colleagues who are experienced in the work and outstanding personnel in the field to be more productive in the unit. Trait leadership theory according to Carayon, (2016) observes that peoples outstanding personal characteristics may foster a leadership that is directed on the right direction. Leaders should therefore try to put emphasis on developing important traits that help them to lead positively. Borrowing of important traits from others also directs leaders to make informed decisions. This brings about the focus on integrity and honesty in the operations that Daisy and Kevin need to undertake. Situational leadership puts emphasis on the fact that leadership varies from the situation at hand to the level of readiness or the competence of leaders in the task. This really explains why the two should observe professional indemnity despite the shortage of workforce in the unit, the two should only engage in fields they are competent in. Strategies That Daisy And Kevin Can Use To Help Them Improve Their Abilities To Perform Effectively As A Leader During Placement And Their Careers Have a multi-dimensional knowledge base This would go a long way in assisting them become better decision makers and consequently better leaders too. This is because, they would be able to put into consideration all the important factors before deciding or arriving at a judgement. Improving their cognitive capabilities This will assist the two develop vital skills such as recalling what they have learnt, there precision will be greatly improved, and their analysis and diagnosis of different cases and situations is likely to improve by a great deal. Improve their emotional capabilities This implies: Awareness of emotions and when they are impacting on decision making, particularly awareness of self-efficacy. Capability to deal with problematic emotions to make difficult decisions required for patient management. Motivation to learn and improve quality of decision making in the face of potentially conflicting emotions that impact on decision. References Carayon, P. (Ed.). (2016).Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. CRC Press. Giltinane, C. L. (2013). Leadership styles and theories. Nursing Standard, 27(41), 35-39 Kouzes, J., Posner, B. (2011). Leadership begins with an inner journey. Leader to Leader, 2011(60), 22-27.